Public says lock up fewer children
Posted on 29/09/2010
Nearly two thirds of the public do not want to see children locked up behind bars until at least the age of 12, rising to 14 for young people convicted of a non-violent crime, according to a new poll. The poll supports the findings of a major new research report by Out of Trouble profiling around 6,000 young people in custody.
Punishing Disadvantage has been written by Dr Jessica Jacobson, Professor Mike Hough and colleagues at the Institute for Criminal Policy Research.
Children as young as 10 can be imprisoned for committing a violent crime in England and Wales, and 12 for a crime that is non-violent. The report highlights the damaged and disadvantaged backgrounds of the majority of young people in custody and the high proportion of children imprisoned for non-violent and less serious offences.
The exclusive YouGov poll was commissioned by the Prison Reform Trust’s Out of Trouble campaign. For the poll, YouGov questioned 2,089 members of the public on their attitudes to imprisoning children and the most effective ways of preventing young people from reoffending. The poll reveals:
Three out of five people (62 per cent) do not support the current minimum age of imprisonment (10) in England and Wales and think it should be at least 12
Nearly two thirds (63 per cent) think the current minimum age of imprisonment for non-violent crime (12) is too low and should be at least 14
Better supervision by parents, treatment to tackle drug addiction, treatment to tackle binge drinking and better mental health care are all rated much more effective than a prison sentence at preventing young offenders from returning to crime.
Despite public support for locking up fewer young people, the UK is readier to send children to prison, and to send children to prison at an earlier age, than most other European countries. In 2009/2010, the average under 18 secure population in England and Wales was 2,444. In June there were 2,173 under 18-year-olds in custody, of which 28 per cent were on remand.
Punishing Disadvantage set out to find out who these children were, and why and how they came to be in custody. The report is based on a census of all children who received custodial sentences or remands in the second half of 2008, approximately 6,000 in total, along with a more detailed examination of the backgrounds of 300 of these children.
The findings reveal the multiple layers of complex disadvantage that characterise the backgrounds of the majority of young people in custody:
At least three quarters of the sample had absent fathers, and a third absent mothers
Half lived in a deprived household and/or unsuitable accommodation
Just under half had runaway or absconded at some point in their lives
More than a quarter had witnessed domestic violence
More than a quarter had experienced local authority care
20 per cent of the sample is known to have harmed themselves; 11 per cent to have attempted suicide
12 per cent were known to have lost a parent or sibling through bereavement
The report also highlights the high proportion of children imprisoned for non-violent and non-serious offences, and the growth in imprisonment of young people for ‘technical’ reasons, such as failing to turn up for supervision appointments or breaking the conditions of an ASBO:
Three out of five of the sample were convicted of offences that would usually result in non-custodial sentences
Half of the children were imprisoned for crimes that were non-violent
Just over one-third were imprisoned for offences that were both less serious and non-violent
Around a fifth had been imprisoned for breaching conditions of community sentences, of ASBOs, of licences following earlier release from custody or for failing to surrender to bail
The authors highlight the persistence of a punitive approach to youth justice in the UK underpinned by a political rhetoric on youth crime that has reinforced public anxiety about reoffending and anti-social behaviour. However, with the government’s ongoing sentencing review and commitment to a ‘rehabilitation revolution’, the current times present valuable opportunities for reform of the youth justice system and the development of a more progressive approach to offending by children.
The detailed recommendations contained in the report are underpinned by three principles:
If offending by children is to be effectively tackled, the welfare needs of these children must be addressed
Deterrence is ineffective when dealing with children whose life to-date has been characterised by abuse and punishment. The lessons they learn will not be those the state intends.
The best way to reduce the use of imprisonment is to lengthen the road to the prison gates.
Juliet Lyon, Director of the Prison Reform Trust, said: ‘The findings of this uniquely comprehensive study will give all of us cause for concern and should reinforce the coalition government's determination to intervene early, support families and get children out of trouble.’
Penelope Gibbs, Director of Out Of Trouble, said: ‘This report shows definitively that children and young people are being doubly punished. First by having traumatic childhoods; then by being locked up, often for not very serious crimes. Prison is often seen as a deterrent, but for these young people it isn't. It is just the last in a long series of bad experiences in which family and state have failed to protect them from harm.’
Notes to editors
A copy of Punishing Disadvantage is available at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/uploads/documents/PunishingDisadvantage.pdf
A less serious offence is defined as an offence that would usually receive a non-custodial penalty.
On 30 June 2010, the Scottish Parliament passed the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill, which raised the age at which a child can be prosecuted in adult criminal courts from eight to 12. Royal Assent was received on 6 August 2010. The full text of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 can be accessed through the http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ website.
YouGov polled 2,089 GB adults on 5 - 6 September 2010.
The Prison Reform Trust
The Prison Reform Trust aims to create a just, humane and effective penal system. We do this by inquiring into the workings of the system; informing prisoners, staff and the wider public; and by influencing parliament, government, and officials towards reform. For the last three years the Prison Reform Trust has been running Out of Trouble (www.outoftrouble.org.uk), a programme whose aim is to reduce the number of children and young people imprisoned across the UK. This programme is supported by The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund over five years. www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk
The Institute for Criminal Policy Research
The Institute for Criminal Policy Research carries out multidisciplinary research into crime and the criminal justice system. We produce work which is independent, and objective and of the highest technical quality. Our key audiences are managers and practitioners within the criminal justice system, other professionals working with offenders, and politicians and their advisors. Our research approaches incorporate both quantitative and qualitative methods. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/law/research/icpr
King's College London
King's College London is one of the top 25 universities in the world (Times Higher Education 2009) and the fourth oldest in England. A research-led university based in the heart of London, King's has nearly 23,000 students (of whom more than 8,600 are graduate students) from nearly 140 countries, and some 5,500 employees. King's is in the second phase of a £1 billion redevelopment programme which is transforming its estate. King's has an outstanding reputation for providing world-class teaching and cutting-edge research. In the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise for British universities, 23 departments were ranked in the top quartile of British universities; over half of our academic staff work in departments that are in the top 10 per cent in the UK in their field and can thus be classed as world leading. The College is in the top seven UK universities for research earnings and has an overall annual income of nearly £450 million.
King's has a particularly distinguished reputation in the humanities, law, the sciences (including a wide range of health areas such as psychiatry, medicine, nursing and dentistry) and social sciences including international affairs. It has played a major role in many of the advances that have shaped modern life, such as the discovery of the structure of DNA and research that led to the development of radio, television, mobile phones and radar. It is the largest centre for the education of healthcare professionals in Europe; no university has more Medical Research Council Centres.
King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas', King's College Hospital and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trusts are part of King's Health Partners. King's Health Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre (AHSC) is a pioneering global collaboration between one of the world's leading research-led universities and three of London's most successful NHS Foundation Trusts, including leading teaching hospitals and comprehensive mental health services. For more information, visit: www.kingshealthpartners.org.
Public Relations Department
Tel: 020 7848 3202