Communicative practices and memory culturalization processes across borders: two conflict-affected case-studies
This interdisciplinary project brings together Ethnographic and Interactional Sociolinguistics (EIS) and Memory Studies (MS) to investigate how cultural meanings of conflict legacies take shape through communicative practices. To do this, data from existing projects on Sri Lankan Tamil and Greek-Cypriot diasporas in London, complemented with new data from Sri Lanka, will be analysed and compared. Sri Lanka and Cyprus are apposite cases to study as they involve protracted conflicts at different spatio-temporal/politico-institutional trajectories, allowing insight into the formation of conflict memories at different stages of culturalization, from barely institutionalised (Sri Lanka) to fully institutionalised (Cyprus).The project is significant as there has been little research that examines how communicative practices (traditionally examined in EIS) and affective practices associated with trauma can link to the formation of cultural memory (traditionally studied in MS). It will be thus one of the few comparative studies of memory that theorizes it from a bottom-up perspective.
Co-investigator
Dr. Constadina Charalambous (European University Cyprus)
Project team members
-
Dr. Thomas Van de Putte – Assistant Professor (University of Trento, Italy)
- Professor Ben Rampton – Professor of Applied and Socio Linguistics (King’s College London)
- Dr. Emma McCluskey – Senior Lecturer in Social Sciences (University of Westminster)
-
Professor Michalinos Zembylas - Professor of Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies (Open University of Cyprus)
-
Minoya Patkunam – PhD student (King’s College London)
-
Dr. Xanthia Aristidou - Project Manager at CARDET and a Scientific Collaborator (European University of Cyprus)
Aims
The project aims to answer the following research questions:
RQ1: How do young (18-35 year-old) Sri Lankan Tamils and Greek-Cypriots in the UK and homeland, talk about, express feelings and form collective memories of past violence? To what extent are these social processes of remembering different in homeland and diaspora?
RQ2: To what extent and why are the processes of memory culturalization of the Sri Lankan civil war different from those observed in the Cyprus conflict? And how can we theorise these differences across contexts?
RQ3: How can this comparative account contribute to a shared conceptual and analytic vocabulary between EIS and MS, consolidating the potential for collaborative studies of the interplay of language, affect and memory?
Principal Investigator
Affiliations
Funding
Funding Body: Leverhulme Trust
Amount: 9,981.15
Period: September 2024 - August 2026
