Here are a couple of themes that stood out:
1. Safety and trust come first: Involvement work runs well only when people feel safe and respected. This means taking time to build trust, being transparent about what the involvement work can and cannot achieve, establishing codes of conduct, and ensuring participants can step back at any time without consequence.
2. Involvement should be meaningful: Involving people with lived experience from the start of a project is critical in helping to shape questions, design services and review materials. Look to establish shared goals with lived experience members. Avoid simply creating passive involvement opportunities (for example, giving feedback on final products). Honour people’s experience and actively seek to encourage people to share their opinions and act on this feedback.
3. Support for everyone involved: Facilitators of involvement activities need training to handle emotional disclosures safely, and participants should have access to follow-up support if the process triggers distress. Clear safeguarding and debrief procedures are essential.
4. Create feedback loops: Ensure lived experience members are given feedback/updates on how their work has made a difference. This activity helps re-establish trust and sustains engagement for future projects.
We translated these findings into a set of accessible and engaging outputs for services to use widely to support their involvement activities, including the animation above. We officially launched these materials at an online public webinar event, funded by King’s College London, on 3rd October 2025.
What this means for services
Some key take-home messages I want to share with you to consider before starting involvement work are:
1. Prepare carefully: Plan ahead to encourage representation of underserved communities, to build trust and ensure safety, to co-develop terms of reference and to establish support systems.
2. Be truly collaborative: Recognise the expertise of your lived experience members, empower them to use their voices to affect change and action their recommendations.
3. Communicate clearly: Use accessible, non-technical and inclusive language and be transparent about goals.
4. Feedback and follow up: Show how lived experience input shapes real change.
These principles may sound simple, but they can make the difference between involvement activities that feels tokenistic and one-sided and activities that truly seek to create services that meet the needs of the people it exists to serve.
Reflections from the process
Conducting this study was a learning experience in itself. Through developing these recommendations, I saw where I had fallen short in my past involvement work activities and which specific areas I needed to improve on (for example, offering frequent de-briefing/check-in sessions after involvement team meetings, routine review of involvement processes and adaptation of processes in line with feedback).
Perhaps most importantly, it reminded me that putting dedicated time aside to specifically have an open dialogue on how the involvement work is experienced – including its strengths and weaknesses – can ensure that people with lived experience have a positive and truly meaningful experience of involvement, as the work flexes and adapts to current requirements of the involvement teams. It helped me be explicit with members about my blind-spots and helped facilitate transparent conversations on what was working well and what could be done better or needed also to be considered.
Looking ahead
As part of the 16 Days of Activism, we encourage everyone working in health, community and social care services to reflect on one key question: