An illustrative detail that resonated with many attendees was the image of cyber defence personnel wearing military uniforms while working behind computer screens in office environments. This visual contrast encapsulated the hybrid nature of cyber defence: although it lacks physical combat, it remains firmly within the military logic of discipline, hierarchy, and national protection. Analytically, this reflects broader debates within security studies about the changing character of war – where operational environments may become less kinetic yet remain strategically consequential.
The discussion also highlighted how cyber defence capabilities are increasingly integrated into national infrastructure and large-scale events, such as preparations linked to COP30 in Brazil. In this context, cyber defence is not limited to countering military threats but extends to protecting critical infrastructure, communication systems and international diplomatic processes. In this sense, cyber defence reveals to be a form of preventive statecraft, reinforcing cyber defence as key instrument for threat containment in both domestic and international settings.
A recurring theme of the event was the recognition of cybersecurity as one of the major defence challenges of the 21st century. Lt Gen Soares de Sousa underscored the growing role of artificial intelligence, noting that while Brazil has developed important cyber capabilities, it still operates within a global hierarchy where technological power is unevenly distributed. This acknowledgement highlighted that cyber defence is not solely about technological sophistication but also about strategic adaptation.
From an international relations standpoint, cyber defence emerged as an evolving practice shaped by competition and collaboration alike. The Lt Gen highlighted exchange programmes and professional interactions between military personnel from different countries, which allow states to learn from diverse approaches to cyber security and develop shared understandings of emerging threats. The emphasis on professional interaction between military personnel challenges traditional assumptions about sovereignty and deterrence: while states continue to pursue national advantage, the transnational nature of cyber threats encourages forms of dialogue and coordination that blur the boundaries between domestic defence and international security politics.
For students in the Department of War Studies, the event offered more than technical knowledge; it provided analytical depth and professional inspiration. From a student perspective, the talk demonstrated how concepts studied in International Relations and Security Studies materialise in real-world defence practices.